fbpx
null

The numbers tell the story :

We’re measurably better together.

From our first pioneering idea to dozens of solutions for the continuum of care, Equinoxe® is a story of unmatched teamwork that drives innovation, research and customer focus.

Are You Planning But Not Navigating?

Preoperative
Planning

Exactech Equinoxe Shoulder Preoperative planning app with ExactechGPS worrkflow planning software tool

Equinoxe® Planning App

Real-time
Navigation

Exactech Real-time navigation with ExactechGPS Shoulder ApplicationReverse Cage Hole Navigation

ExactechGPS®

A Better
Executed Case

  • Intraoperative flexibility
  • Real-time glenoid vault visibility
  • Improved accuracy1,12
  • Better fixation13,14
  • Time neutral after initial cases15,16
  • No capital cost
ExactechGPS Shoulder Application accuracy within 2mm of implant placement

surgeons guided within 2mm of implant placement and 2° of version/inclination compared to their plan1

ExactechGPS Shoulder Application is the first and onlyorthopaedic company to globally launch navigation for shoulder

orthopaedic company to globally launch navigation for shoulder

Equinoxe shoulders navigated using ExactechGPS®

100+

PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES

100+

PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES

CLINICAL SITES

MORE THAN

1

PATIENTS

78%

convertibility
Platform Stem6

aTSA wedge augment preserves8

89%

 

more bone than a standard glenoid

51%

more bone than a step design

Reverse

0.5%

instability5

@4Y

4X

reduction in a TSA glenoid radiolucent lines
(cage vs. all-poly)9

3X

IMPROVEMENT
in external rotation post-op7

SOLUTIONS FOR 100%

of shoulder arthroplasty procedures, from straightforward to challenging

Exactech Equinoxe Stemless Shoulder
AndIn Between
Exactech Equinoxe Humeral Reconstruction Prosthesis
0%

COMPOUND ANNUAL

GROWTH RATE

2

MAJOR

product launches per year

Exactech Equinoxe Shoulder was first to market with biomechanically designed humeral reconstruction system

ST

TO MARKET

with biomechanically designed humeral reconstruction system

15+Y

OF CLINICAL USE

Right From The Start
and still innovating

Exactech Equinoxe Shoulder was first to market with biomechanically designed humeral reconstruction system

FIRST TO MARKET

with biomechanically designed humeral reconstruction system

15+Y

OF CLINICAL USE

Right From The Start
and still innovating

Exactech Equinoxe Shoulder System was first to offer reverse augments for glenoid correction

FIRST

to offer reverse augments

FIRST

to offer reverse augments for glenoid correction

Exactech Equinoxe Shoulder System was first to offer reverse augments for glenoid correction

Looking for more information or to have a Product Manager or Sales Representative contact you?

References
References
  1. Greene, A. et al. Navigated vs. non-navigated results of a CT based computer assisted shoulder arthroplasty system in 30 cadavers. Presented at ISTA 2018.*
  2. Simovitch, R. et al. Effect of tuberosity healing on clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty for 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 33(2), e39-e45. 2019.
  3. Mollon, B. et al. Impact of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 476 shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 26(7), 1253–1261. 2017.
  4. King, J. et al. How common are acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty? Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:627–634.
  5. Friedman, RJ. et al. Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Apr;26(4):662-668. 2017.
  6. Crosby, L. et al. Conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with and without humeral stem retention: the role of a convertible platform stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 3;99(9):736-742.
  7. Friedman RJ. et al. Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Apr;26(4):662-668.
  8. Kersten, AD. et al. Posterior augmented glenoid designs preserve more bone in biconcave glenoids. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jul;24(7):1135-41. AND Roche, C. et al. Biomechanical impact of posterior glenoid wear on anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Bulletin for the Hospital for Joint Diseases. 71(2):S5-11. 2013.
  9. Friedman, RJ. et al. Clinical and radiographic comparison of a hybrid cage glenoid to a cemented polyethylene glenoid in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Article in press. J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2019) -, 1-9.
  10. Stroud, N. et al. Initial glenoid fixation using two different reverse shoulder designs with an equivalent center of rotation in a low-density and high-density bone substitute. J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2013) 22, 1573-1579. AND Stroud, N. et al. Reverse shoulder glenoid loosening: an evaluation of the initial fixation associated with six different reverse shoulder designs. Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases 2013;71(Suppl 2):S12-7.*
  11. Simovitch, R. et al. Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference. J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2018) 27, 298–305.
  12. Nashikkar P., et al. Role of intraoperative navigation in the fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical case-control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Sept.;28(9):1685-1691.
  13. Nashikkar P., et al. Computer navigation re-creates planned glenoid placement and reduces correction variability in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vivo case-control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 July 25. Article in press.
  14. Roche C., et al. Impact of screw length and screw quantity on rTSA glenoid fixation for two different sizes of glenoid baseplates. JSES Open Access (JSESOA-D-19-00048R1).*
  15. Greene A., et al. Clinical Use of a Computer Assisted Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System: An Analysis of 574 Cases. Presented at CAOS 2019.
  16. Greene A., et al. Clinical Use of a Computer Assisted Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System: An Analysis of 1702 Cases. Presented at CAOS 2019.

*In vitro (bench) test results may not necessarily be indicative of clinical performance.

References for JSES April 2020 ads:
  1. Greene A. et al. Navigated vs. non-navigated results of a CT based computer assisted shoulder arthroplasty system in 30 cadavers. Presented at ISTA 2018.*
  2. Nashikkar P., et al. Role of intraoperative navigation in the fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical case-control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Sept.;28(9):1685-1691.
  3. Nashikkar P., et al. Computer navigation re-creates planned glenoid placement and reduces correction variability in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vivo case-control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 July 25. Article in press.
  4. Roche C., et al. Impact of screw length and screw quantity on rTSA glenoid fixation for two different sizes of glenoid baseplates. JSES Open Access (JSESOA-D-19-00048R1).*
  5. Greene A., et al. Clinical Use of a Computer Assisted Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System: An Analysis of 574 Cases. Presented at CAOS 2019.
  6. Greene A., et al. Clinical Use of a Computer Assisted Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System: An Analysis of 1702 Cases. Presented at CAOS 2019.

*In vitro (bench) test results may not necessarily be indicative of clinical performance.

Menu
X