Optetrak Logic PS

Optetrak Logic Posterior Stabilized

Optetrak Logic® is an advanced approach to total knee replacement that introduces modern design features and intuitive instrumentation while building on the wisdom of a strong design lineage.  Optetrak Logic PS is an approach to total knee arthroplasty that just makes sense. From a simplified, bone-preserving technique to efficient, tissue sparing instrumentation, Optetrak Logic PS streamlines efficiency in the O.R. while meeting the demands of today’s more active patients.

30 Percent Less Bone.1 A Notch Above the Rest.

 

Optetrak Logic PS

 

  • Cylindrical bone resection design simplifies notch preparation and removes less bone compared to traditional box resections1
  •  Deep, wide femoral groove and contoured femoral flange reduce strain in the retinaculum, allowing for more natural patellar tracking2-4
  • Hi-Flex® design allows maximum flexion potential without posterior impingement5
  •  Patented optimized femoral/tibial congruency reduces contact and polyethylene stresses2
  • Direct compression molded polyethylene minimizes wear and polyethylene debris6
  • Modular tibial components feature a three-part locking mechanism to prevent insert motion and disclocation.7-9

 

Optetrak Logic Logo

When Innovation and Intuition Align

 

1. Data of file at Exactech. 051K. Intercondylar Femoral Notch Preparation for Posterior Stabilized Knee Arthroplasty –Volumetric Bone Resection According to Two Methods.

2.  Robinson RP. Comparison of clinical results of the third, fourth, and fifth generations of the Hospital for Special Surgery prosthetic knee implant. Presented at the Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Society, Fall 1999. Farmington, PA.

3. Sculco TP. The significance of patellar clunk: how loud the sound! Presented at Current Concepts in Joint Replacement, Winter 1999.

4.  Petty RW. Caveats in patello-femoral design. Presented at the 10th Annual Meeting, Current Concepts in Joint Replacement, Orlando, FL. 1994.

5.  Data on file at Exactech, Inc.

6.  Furman BD, Lai S, Li S. A comparison of knee simulator wear rates between directly molded and extruded UHMWPE. Presented at Society for Biomaterials, 2001.

7.  Engh GA, Lounici S, Rao AR, Collier MB. In vivo deterioration of tibial baseplate locking mechanisms in contemporary modular total knee components. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83-A:1660-5.

8. Li S, Scuderi G, Furman BD, Bhattacharyya S, Schmieg JJ, Insall JN. Assessment of backside wear from the analysis of 55 retrieved tibial inserts. Clin Orthop. 2002;(404):75-82.

9. Jayabalan P, Furman B, Cottrell J, Wright T. Backside wear in modern total knee design. HSSJ. 2007;3:30-4.20.